The breaker-and-a-half scheme can be
developed from a ring bus arrangement as the number of circuits
increases. In this scheme, each circuit is between two circuit
breakers, and there are two main buses.
The breaker-and-a half scheme,
sometimes called the three-switch scheme, has three breakers in
series between two main buses. Two circuits are connected between the
three breakers, hence the term breaker and a half. This pattern is
repeated along the main buses so that one and a half breakers are
used for each circuit.
Under normal operating conditions, all
breakers are closed, and both buses are energized. A circuit is
tripped by opening the two associated circuit breakers. Tiebreaker
failure will trip one additional circuit, but no additional circuit
is lost if a line trip involves failure of a bus breaker.
Either bus may be taken out of service
at any time with no loss of service. With sources connected opposite
to loads, it is possible to operate with both buses out of service.
Breaker maintenance can be done with no loss of service, no relay
changes, and simple operation of the breaker disconnects.
The failure of a circuit will trip the
two adjacent breakers and not interrupt any other circuit. With the
three breaker arrangement for each bay, a center breaker failure will
cause the loss of the two adjacent circuits.
However, a breaker failure of the
breaker adjacent to the bus will only interrupt one circuit.
Maintenance of a breaker on this scheme can be performed without an
outage to any circuit.
Furthermore, either bus can be taken
out of service with no interruption to the service. This is one of
the most reliable arrangements, and it can continue to be expanded as
required. Relaying is more involved than some schemes previously
discussed. This scheme will require more area and is costly due to
the additional components.
The breaker-and-a-half arrangement is
more expensive than the other schemes, with the exception of the
double breaker, double-bus scheme, and protective relaying and
automatic reclosing schemes are more complex than for other schemes.
However, the breaker-and-a half scheme is superior in flexibility,
reliability, and safety.
Hi, you explained the topic very well.for more details something like visit circuit breaker types get more informations.
ReplyDeleteVisit Great Offers
ReplyDelete